Wednesday, December 5, 2012

In-Class Essay Critique



           The first issue is the point of view and the perspective that the essay takes. The perspective is from someone outside of Christianity, not even someone very well-educated on the topic that is written about. Writing from the opposing view may help see the concepts in a different way but this essay failed to do so accurately. The ideas presented are distorted and do not line up with the focuses that have been presented in class.
            The next issue is the essay’s relativity to the prompt that was provided. A quote by Luigi Giussani was provided and a few questions to aid in developing a focus or topic. This essay seemed to diverge from that path and take its own path that was inaccurate and strange. The essay created an analogy about the relationship between God and reality. The analogy might have initially had a clever intention, but looking back on it, it was not good.  It was trying to get at God’s covenants with his people in the Old Testament and how each time they failed; God gave people another chance until he sent his son, Christ. However, the way the argument was put forth was weak and not well planned or reflected upon.
            Overall, the essay seems sort of cynical or at least negative towards Christianity. The analogy was clever but executed poorly and inaccurately. Compared the works and things the class has addressed, this essay seemed to negate most things. The point of view taken kindled the negative approach and helped create a cynical view. The essay got on a roller coaster ride but was not harnessed securely to the seat and took a fall to imminent death.

No comments:

Post a Comment